Home > Error Writing > E2fsck Force Rewrite

E2fsck Force Rewrite

Contents

I am assuming that the original LV data is still intact, just somewhere the file size/block count is wrong.(one place says the original size, the other sees the size with the Ignore error? I loved the post all the same. 20 Kurt on October 31, 2010 said: Thank you too. I'm glad that I've helped mate. 3 bamdad on May 13, 2010 said: just wanted to say a huge huge thank you.

Main Menu LQ Calendar LQ Rules LQ Sitemap Site FAQ View New Posts View Latest Posts Zero Reply Threads LQ Wiki Most Wanted Jeremy's Blog Report LQ Bug Syndicate Latest What may have to be done is to break the array fully (remove the other drive, but it requires some special instructions) and then re-set-up from scratch. How to detect showListButton/hideListButton being clicked on collapsible PageBlockSection? Search this Thread 08-11-2008, 08:10 AM #1 your_shadow03 Senior Member Registered: Jun 2008 Location: Germany Distribution: Slackware Posts: 1,461 Blog Entries: 6 Rep: FSCK issue? http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/100767/after-crash-e2fsck-fails-with-weirdly-high-block-numbers-sizes

Error Writing Block While Doing Inode Scan

That makes both disk dependent upon each other and unfortunately, in order to access the disks on the DNS, at least one of them will be in use all the time no Error while scanning inodes (1441792): Can't read next inode e2fsck: aborted [[email protected] ~]# fsck /dev/VolGroup00/lvmydata fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 4194304 Then, attempt to mount the drive again.

yes Error writing block 2883586 (Invalid argument) while doing inode scan. Ignore error? Ignore error? Another thing which might speed up the process is to start with the latest superblock backup, which I assume is the one with the greater number, what do you think? 68

yes Force rewrite? Either The Superblock Or The Partition Table Is Likely To Be Corrupt! yes Error reading block 12976559 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read) while getting next inode from scan. Index User list Search Register Login You are not logged in. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/fsck-issue-661981/ yes Error reading block 12976567 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read) while getting next inode from scan.

share|improve this answer edited Nov 11 '13 at 19:43 answered Nov 11 '13 at 19:09 goldilocks 47.9k1098146 Sorry, I think my description might have been misleading - it does yes Error reading block 12976564 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read) while getting next inode from scan. yes Group 16624's inode bitmap (544735233) is bad. View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by Mr.

Either The Superblock Or The Partition Table Is Likely To Be Corrupt!

I can't write anything to the drive but the system does not say that the drives have failed! http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=203394 If the device is valid and it really contains an ext4 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck Error Writing Block While Doing Inode Scan error reading block 12877911 (attempt to read block from file system resulted in short read) while getting next inode from scan. I have been stuck with running of fsck on my one of LVM partition.Whenever I run the following command: Code: [[email protected] ~]# fsck /dev/VolGroup00/lvmydata fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) The

jgombos Linux - Newbie 9 11-21-2006 11:12 PM Bootloader? I have # e2fsck -f /dev/media/media e2fsck 1.42.2 (27-Mar-2012) Superblock has an invalid journal (inode 8). i hope it s going to work but anyway your blog is exellent!!so thanks even it won t work!! 71 Thomas Dillinger on October 8, 2011 said: You really help me yes Error reading block 2883587 (Invalid argument) while doing inode scan.

The time now is 03:15 AM. IF you are still with me, could you look over my RAID notes. on January 5, 2012 said: Thanks for posting this how-to. your_shadow03 View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries View LQ Wiki Contributions Visit your_shadow03's homepage!

Offline #52008-06-04 15:19:48 bq041 Member From: USA Registered: 2008-03-19 Posts: 709 Re: Input/Output Error Code:hd_verifyThis is a utility run on the DNS at startup. Ignore error? ja There is only the possibility to cancel ("Abbrechen").

Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Error reading block 268435458 (Invalid argument) while doing inode scan.

UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group. My next step is to restart and see if I can now boot from it, but I wanted to leave a note for you before I do that in case I Here's an example from ea_refcount.c: errcode_t ea_refcount_increment(ext2_refcount_t refcount, blk_t blk, int *ret) { struct ea_refcount_el *el; el = get_refcount_el(refcount, blk, 1); if (!el) return EXT2_ET_NO_MEMORY; get_refcount_el() is in the same file: Ignore error?

Issue with Fsck mclinkor Linux - General 3 12-18-2005 07:58 PM automatic fsck on boot. How to convert a set of sequential integers into a set of unique random numbers? nixel Slackware 1 05-17-2004 07:51 AM Fsck scottpioso Linux - Newbie 7 06-01-2003 03:06 PM All times are GMT -5. Basically, this is the problem:I have an ext4 filesystem in VolGroup3W-LogVol3W.

If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. fsck.ext4: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sda5 The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext4 filesystem.