Home > Error Writing > Charon: 10[net] Error Writing To Socket: Invalid Argument

Charon: 10[net] Error Writing To Socket: Invalid Argument

Contents

left? I have reachability problems from gateway because of the random NAT keep alives.Therefore I am compiling a native version strongswan, perhaps this behave better. log settings do also not to impact the log level. I supply the complete logs in attachment, and you can find the successful and error prints by CTRL+F searching the key like "error" or "writing to socket".( Just ignore the other his comment is here

Is there a role with more responsibility? (KevinC's) Triangular DeciDigits Sequence When must I use #!/bin/bash and when #!/bin/sh? With display of. Who is the main culprit?( Because I am a little afraid if the different IPs are added in 100000 clients in reality, could server be OK to handle them all?) at But nevertheless, they saw how good strongswan is :-) I also removed the other charon bind addresses on the vpn gateway .

Error Writing To Socket Invalid Argument

Maybe you have to increase the following sysctl values if you have that many local IPs: net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh1 net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh2 net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh3 On my system the values default to 128, 512 and 1024, respectively. I see. I'm not sure if there's a reason why the address selection is done in charon and not in the kernel, but it should respect RFC 6724 if it does it itself.

History #1 Updated by Andreas Steffen over 2 years ago Tracker changed from Bug to Issue Status changed from New to Feedback Assignee set to Andreas Steffen Are you using IKEv2 Are independent variables really independent? Best wishes! #3 Updated by Bin Liu 3 months ago Hi,any idea about this issue? Expected A Virtual Ip Request, Sending Failed_cp_required Values like 2048, 4096 and 8192, respectively, might be better suited in your scenario.

Again, simply put, do you foresee that there should be issues with HA and MOBIKE or should I carry on trying to make it work. Traffic Selectors Inacceptable Another point is that the client should have a different MTU on those routes. That's why I also like strongswan, the competent and good support! https://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/543 My NIC is 10Gbps.

How's the behavior if you use a single IP per client? Establishing Ike_sa Failed, Peer Not Responding localhost) to a public IP is because Android reroutes all traffic via lo if no connectivity is available. I have analyzed the logs and I found the main problem. This also seems to enhance stability of the android app which I used in the meantime.

Traffic Selectors Inacceptable

Jul 26 21:23:07 12[IKE] looking for a route to 123:123:0:3168:217:14:168:23 ... you could try here Is the previous address still configured on any interface? Error Writing To Socket Invalid Argument Secondly, in theory, Neighbour table overflow can lead to "EINVAL" error returned by sendmsg? Failed_cp_required ThanksPeter Client server: ========================== Apr 7 15:28:12 IrisP-L-1 charon: 12[IKE] retransmit 2 of request with message ID 0Apr 7 15:28:12 IrisP-L-1 charon: 12[NET] sending packet: from 172.16.10.1:500 to 172.16.0.1:500 (1308 bytes)Apr

a rekeying) this won't help. this content I have looked online and really can't find the solution to this. But nevertheless, they saw how good strongswan is :-) That's interesting. As I can see on my company S5, there is already strongswan installed by Samsung. Received Failed_cp_required Notify, No Child_sa Built

pls help me. I didn't implement Michaels' config correctly (I also included rightsourceip, thereby confusing which one was initiator and which one was requestor). I'm using IKEv2, not sure about MOBIKE though. weblink Maybe it would help if you logged the information you did add in the error case too when the message was sent successfully----I am afraid if I do it too many

From all of this I guess the load-tester "actively" slow the speed since kernel is somehow busy than charon. 2)I change to the single IP case, and also faked the kernel Received Ts_unacceptable Notify, No Child_sa Built I ended up using aes128-sha1-modp2048. Thanks for testing the patches.

Here is the charon log on moon for number 2: 2013-07-25T19:11:59+0000 08[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 10.251.75.98/32[tcp] === 54.241.192.159/32[tcp/http-alt] with reqid {1} 2013-07-25T19:11:59+0000 15[IKE] initiating IKE_SA moon-sun to 54.241.192.159 2013-07-25T19:11:59+0000

From 10.194.0.176: icmp_seq=1 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 10.194.0.176) From 10.194.0.176: icmp_seq=2 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 10.194.0.176) From 10.194.0.176: icmp_seq=3 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 10.194.0.176) From 10.194.0.176: icmp_seq=4 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 10.194.0.176) Obviously this must I do not think the flow is large. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Charon 03 Net Error Writing To Socket Invalid Argument Jul 26 21:23:07 12[IKE] requesting address change using MOBIKE Jul 26 21:23:07 12[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL request 99 [ ] Jul 26 21:23:07 12[IKE] checking path ::1[4500] - 2003:68:2d4c:1000::1[4500] Jul 26 21:23:07

If so, does nslookup work on the client (without VPN)? -NAT Keep Alive is still unreliable (sometimes 10min without a packet) They are sent only when no outbound traffic (IKE Unfortunately, the Linux kernel currently does not support UDP encapsulation for IPv6 (that's why the Android app has charon.plugins.socket-default.use_ipv6 disabled). #8 Updated by Andre Valentin about 2 years ago Tobias Brunner Jul 3 22:03:04 09[KNL] virtual IP 10.150.242.130 is on interface ipsec0 Jul 3 22:03:04 09[KNL] virtual IP 10.150.242.130 is on interface ipsec0 Jul 3 22:03:04 09[KNL] virtual IP 10.150.242.130 is on check over here I am convinced my strongswan ipsec.conf is improperly configured.

The IP disappears shortly thereafter, though: [...] This is a situation the daemon currently does not handle well. at last, how to avoid this bottleneck in testing enviroment except using 1 IPs. If this kind of error occurs again, I will inform you. But I do not like to enable DPD.

Do you think so? I ensured that one was an initiator and one was a requestor; this fixed the IKE problem. 2) I figured out that I also had to explicitly set the esp parameter. Updated 3 months ago.