Ubuntu Error While Copying Destination Is Read Only
Comment on this change (optional) Email me about changes to this bug report gvfs (Debian) Edit Fix Released Unknown debbugs #536757 You need to log in to change this bug's It would be valuable information. libsmbclient-3.5.4-62.fc13.x86_64 gvfs-1.6.2-1.fc13.x86_64 nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13.x86_64 Comment 13 Nicholas Kudriavtsev 2010-07-23 09:14:18 EDT With Samba share on local network write is OK! By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. http://smartphpstatistics.com/error-while/error-while-copying-in-ubuntu.html
I just did a fresh install in a VM last night, and the only way I can get proper user/group perms is to use an old smb script that manually mounts Sep 10, 2010 I'm not sure why the sndto() is failing. Oded Arbel (oded-geek) wrote on 2009-08-10: #17 You are more then welcome to nudge the developers using GNOME's Bugzilla :-) , Just make sure that you are polite about it. I can write to the host share via gvfs.
Error While Copying Ubuntu Invalid Argument
Home | New | Search | [?] | Reports | Requests | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] | Report Bugzilla Bug Legal I added the "affects project" for autofs too late after the relevant gvfs issues were fixed. If anyone else wishes to confirm, please use the "affects me too" link at the top of the page. To know or not to know ......
fixed in karmic. There's samba-3.5.6-69.fc13 build available in updates-testing, can you give it a shot please? The JPEG image was partially copied > when smb terminated. I don't consider gvfs in its current state as much use for a networked PC.
Is there something I'm missing here - perhaps something that needs to be updated in the auto.smb script in order to restore Jaunty's read/write behaviour using this new smbclient package? Presumably it's the same underlying issues as with Nautilus? But I found out something new. internet Read more...
Any directory >When you say GUI, you mean Nautilus file manager? Affecting: gvfs (Ubuntu Maverick) Filed here by: Martin Pitt When: 2010-11-23 Completed: 2010-11-23 Package (Find…) Status Importance Invalid Undecided Assigned to Nobody Me Comment on this change (optional) Email me about This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. Edvinas (ikonitas) wrote on 2011-02-02: #67 [email protected]:/etc/samba$ dpkg-query -W smbclient smbclient 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu8.2 Still the same issue on ubuntu 10.10 x64 Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2011-02-04 Changed in samba: importance: Unknown
Ubuntu Error While Copying Permission Denied
Seehttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how toenable and use -proposed. Is there anything specific set on the server? Error While Copying Ubuntu Invalid Argument Jan 15, 2011 I was trying to change the console fonts. Thank you in advance!** Also affects: gvfs (Ubuntu Maverick)Importance: UndecidedStatus: New** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Maverick)Importance: UndecidedStatus: New** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Maverick)Status: New => Invalid** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Maverick)Status:
The relevant bug report in GNOME's bugzilla is this: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588391 - this is the original bug report coordinated with Debian and Ubuntu which was eventually fixed by Jeremy Allison in Samba's http://smartphpstatistics.com/error-while/error-while-archiving-folder-in-store-the-destination-folder-contains-items-of-a-different-type.html My OS is Fedora 14. The folder does not exist on this remote PC. > > At the start of the copy, Nautilus creates the folder "Tarantula", > then terminates with the error: "Error while copying Done Suggested packages: openbsd-inetd inet-superserver smbldap-tools ldb-tools The following NEW packages will be installed: samba 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
And anybody built the patched version yet ? scottuss 2010-12-01 16:40:27 UTC PermalinkRaw Message Finally! The Linux version i had was 18.104.22.168-85.fc13.x86_64 smbclient Version 3.5.5-68.fc13 Gnome Nautilus 2.30.1 Hopefully a patch coming out soon, cause isn't very productive! navigate here LennartP (lennart-preuss) wrote on 2013-02-03: #71 I have the same problem on ununtu 12.04.
Or how I might find out. I have some extensions > like these: > > nautilus-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 > nautilus-python-0.7.0-2.fc14.x86_64 > nautilus-sendto-2.31.7-1.fc14.x86_64 > rabbitvcs-nautilus-0.13.3-2.fc14.x86_64 > brasero-nautilus-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 > nautilus-extensions-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 > totem-nautilus-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 > evince-nautilus-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 > > but I can't say if As opposed to the whole directory?
At least SP2 and possibly later patches must be applied.
Comment 29 Simon Scott 2010-10-21 03:19:18 EDT Likewise - I have limited resources and am a complete Linux newbie but happy to help if I can. As previously stated, I've updated to smbclient 3.4.0-3 (now ubuntu5 as of posting), but all my smb shares are /still/ mounted read-only by autofs. Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies. View 9 Replies View Related Ubuntu :: TTY Fonts - KDFONTOP: Invalid Argument ?
This is difficult to debug, I can't see anything obvious from the daemon log attached. The automated Bug Watch Updater indicates activity as well. Or the other way around? his comment is here Then I decided to try Mint 11 (34bit CD) - result after Grub blank screen other than flashing cursor at top left.No input from keyboard.Tried Mint KDE 10 (34bit DVD) same
Fix for takenfrom upstream (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7791)-- Chuck Short
I can't find bug report for the deletion problem though. I don't know if there are others packages involved in this operation. Comment 50 Johnson Lai 2010-11-20 20:22:32 EST Sorry, my windows share on my Fc13-64 is still isn't work. Yes, sorry about that.
Thanks all. Install beta karmic on your client PC, then update fully. 3. This seems to be like a fault when setting mtime or any additional attributes.