Home > Error While > Deleting Sa Reason "death By Retransmission P1" State (i) Mm_no_state

Deleting Sa Reason "death By Retransmission P1" State (i) Mm_no_state


On my cisco 2821, i have this logs: (78.xx.xx.xx is wan ip of c2821) (95.xx.xx.xx is the wan IP of the ISP Routers) Mar 25 17:09:28.307: ISAKMP:(0): SA request profile is Could you please explain which keys these are and how does one configure their lifetimes? · actions · 2011-Sep-12 2:26 pm · OVERKILLjoin:2010-04-05Peterborough, ON

OVERKILL Member 2011-Sep-12 2:36 pm said by Here are the debug outputs you required.CISCO7200#ping source Type escape sequence to abort.Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to , timeout is 2 seconds:Packet sent with a source address of Aug  4 Show 8 replies 1. this contact form

So what you need to do is this. I remember your setup and there are alot of layers of complexity. · actions · 2011-Sep-5 9:58 am · DocLargePremium Memberjoin:2004-09-08 DocLarge Premium Member 2011-Sep-5 10:18 am I actually got gid I've also cutout some extra values that weren't relevant just to save space. Attached new ipsec request to it. (local, remote*Sep 2 18:07:54.534: ISAKMP: Error while processing SA request: Failed to initialize SA*Sep 2 18:07:54.534: ISAKMP: Error while processing KMI message 0, https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/61216

Error While Processing Kmi

Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. 0 GRE Tunnel issue Started by Attention? , Dec 02 2010 03:36 AM Please log in to reply 9 replies to this topic #1 Re: phase 1 ISAKMP failure Dan Sep 18, 2013 9:53 AM (in response to Aaron Francis) I had this same thing happen recently and never did find the root cause. GE washing machine went kaboom. [HomeImprovement] by ironweasel346.

And it will take. message ID = 0 Mar 25 17:09:46.717: ISAKMP:(0): processing NONCE payload. Events Experts Bureau Events Community Corner Awards & Recognition Behind the Scenes Feedback Forum Cisco Certifications Cisco Press Café Cisco On Demand Support & Downloads Login | Register Search form Search My_port 500 Peer_port 500 (i) Mm_no_state Edited by lostchild, 02 December 2010 - 03:57 AM. 0 Back to top #3 laf_c laf_c Firewalls&Routing specialist Members 1787 posts Gender:Male Location:Romania Interests:Networking, tenis and chess Posted 02 December 2010

Index | Next | Previous | Print Thread | View Threaded noc at phibee Mar25,2010,10:14AM Post #1 of 2 (6147 views) Permalink Cisco IPsec with Nat ? Sa Is Still Budding. Attached New Ipsec Request To It. message ID = 0 Mar 25 17:09:46.434: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload Mar 25 17:09:46.434: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 245 mismatch Mar 25 17:09:46.434: ISAKMP (0): vendor ID Logs on the peer.Once you determine when the packet is getting lost/dropped you will be able to determine why and fix the problem. · actions · 2011-Sep-12 1:17 am · F430

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26282280-Crypto-ISAKMP-Debugging I appriciate the reply from you all. .Dec 1 11:27:11.045 est: ISAKMP:(0): SA request profile is (NULL) .Dec 1 11:27:11.045 est: ISAKMP: Created a peer struct for, peer port 500

Access list 101 defines what traffic goes across the tunnel Access-list 1 or now 111 defines what traffic gets NAtted or not. Find A Dup Sa In The Avl Tree During Calling Isadb_insert Sa Create another ACL like this: access-list 120 permit udp host rtrB-ip host rtrA-ip eq isakmp log access-list 120 permit esp host rtrB-ip host rtrA-ip log access-list 120 permit ip any any Adios Time Warner/Charter [TimeWarnerCable] by jduffy263. They see that their ASA5510 responds back to an initialization packet coning from the sites 2911 ISR router but no communication comes back from the router past that initial packet sent

Sa Is Still Budding. Attached New Ipsec Request To It.

the configuration is mirror of one onther.crypto isakmp policy 1 encr 3des hash md5 authentication pre-share group 2crypto isakmp key 6 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX address isakmp keepalive 30 5!!crypto ipsec transform-set tripleDES why not try these out Attention? Error While Processing Kmi About a year ago, NOSX mentioned something about how your connection to your ISP could mess with your tunnel configuration sometimes and mentioned using "crypto isakmp agressive-mode disable;" MSN had told Error False Reason "ike Deleted" How about posted the newly revised config on each end so we can look at a fresh copy now. 0 Message Author Comment by:bluecc2010-08-14 Ken, Thanks for hanging in there

Follow us:Terms & ConditionsPrivacy StatementCookie PolicyTrademarksLanguagesChinaJapanIndiaJive Software Version: , revision: Custom Search form Search Search VPN Cisco Support Community Cisco.com Search Language: EnglishEnglish 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish) Português (Portuguese) http://smartphpstatistics.com/error-while/error-while-deleting-key-vista.html You'll see a few packets showing up from the new log message. I must have missed it. Mar 25 17:09:46.438: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE Mar 25 17:09:46.438: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_R_MM1 New State = IKE_R_MM2 Mar 25 17:09:46.713: ISAKMP (0): received packet from 95.xx.xx.xx dport 500 sport 10054 Error False Reason "informational (in) State 1"

Unfortunately, the new ccnp route exam uses crypto map scenarios, which is why I'm hard & heavy on working with them. Microsoft is the Devil ... [Microsoft] by NormanS561. You access-list looks good. http://smartphpstatistics.com/error-while/error-while-dumping-state-probably-corrupted-stack.html Request you to briefly explain me the defferance between IPsec & GRE tunnel. 0 Back to top #7 andr2ea_g andr2ea_g MPLS & multicast Specialist Members 301 posts Gender:Not Telling Posted 03

A simple IPsec tunnel between fast Ethernet interfaces of routers SW1 (f1/1) and R1(f0/0). Error While Processing Kmi Message 0 Error 2 Cisco message ID = 3447124363Sep 18 16:32:54.095: ISAKMP:(1487):peer does not do paranoid keepalives.Sep 18 16:32:54.095: ISAKMP:(1487):deleting node -847842933 error FALSE reason "Informational (in) state 1"Sep 18 16:32:56.271: ISAKMP:(1487):purging node -746546077Sep 18 16:33:02.099: Please remove any sensitive info.Also, kindly post the output of the following after you've made a ping from a source host/PC behind the 7200 towards the remote internal IP:show crypto isakmp

and the topic is a little misleading, I don't think it's a GRE tunnel, looks rather IPSEC isakmp negotiation!!!

Like Show 0 Likes (0) Actions Join this discussion now: Log in / Register 4. Don't change 111 from that. The peer is responding but the packet is not getting back to the 8715. Sa Request Profile Is (null) Mar 25 17:09:58.304: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE Mar 25 17:09:58.304: ISAKMP:(0):SA is still budding.

Mar 25 17:09:46.721: ISAKMP (4977): His hash no match - this node outside NAT Mar 25 17:09:46.721: ISAKMP (4977): His hash no match - this node outside NAT Mar 25 17:09:46.721: Attached new ipsec request to it. (local , remote ) 000168: *Aug 14 20:25:10.501 PCTime: ISAKMP: Error while processing SA request: Failed to initialize SA 000169: *Aug 14 20:25:10.501 PCTime: ISAKMP: Here's the sh crypto session. http://smartphpstatistics.com/error-while/regedit-error-while-deleting-key.html There are two vpn tunnels established on this router and the other tunnel is just fine and has been for awhile, so its just a single vpn tunnel in question.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of .....