Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File Cpio Md5 Sum Mismatch
Would like to use fpm in the future when this is resolved. When you install a SRPM package, the specfile (the one with the .spec extension) will be placed in your ~/rpmbuild/SPECS directory, and all other files contained in the SRPM (usually source On CentOS, this shared object file is pre-linked, since it used to live on the file system, and prelink runs via cron every so often to keep its libraries freshly pre-linked Remember, if you break it, you get to keep all the pieces. http://smartphpstatistics.com/error-unpacking/error-unpacking-of-archive-failed-on-file-cpio-rename.html
It does have a "--nosignature" switch, however, that didn't resolve the problem:Code: Select allnice rpmbuild --define="_topdir $rpmdir" --nodeps --rebuild --nosignature ImageMagick*.src.rpm
warning: user cristy does not exist - using In my case, this was the file libpython3.5m.so.1.0, graciously copied from the filesystem via cx_Freeze (a python packaging library/system). Owner jordansissel commented Oct 5, 2016 No idea, haha. Finally, some distribution-independent open source software is available in the form of SRPMs. https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2008-May/msg00011.html
Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File Md5 Sum Mismatch
Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives | Home | Support | FAQ | About Publications Open MPI Team FAQ Videos Performance Open MPI Software Download Documentation Source Code Access Bug Tracking Reload to refresh your session. If FPM were to be improved, it might try to un-prelink SO files in the staging directory in the output section in rpm.rb. Sign up for free to join this Note: Although you may have success with rebuilding and using SRPMs from other distros, it is not guaranteed that you will.
running prelink -u against any binaries you are packaging may fix as well. Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. That is the file you will use to build the RPM. Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File Cpio Read Failed - Bad File Descriptor The advantage of unpacking the SRPM first and then using rpmbuild -ba to rebuild it from the specfile is that you can modify the specfile (and maybe add some patches or
I'll keep digging. For CentOS-6 the corresponding Fedora versions are 12/13, the approximate versions from which EL6 was forked, and many Fedora 14 and above SRPMs will build successfully. For instance, on CentOS 5.8 x86_64 with rpm 188.8.131.52-28.el5_8: [root_at_horizon _tmp]# rpmbuild --rebuild openmpi-1.4.5-1.src.rpm Installing openmpi-1.4.5-1.src.rpm warning: user jsquyres does not exist - using root error: unpacking of archive failed on Password Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.
Workarounds: 1) Run prelink -u on all shared libraries and dynamic binaries before packaging with fpm (rpmbuild) 2) or, a worse workaround: trick rpmbuild into using the file's digest, not the Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File /usr/lib/node_modules/npm/doc Cpio Rename when invoking fpm? Hmm :| Owner jordansissel commented Oct 5, 2016 I tried with a .so in my rpm package also and it was also unchanged in the rpm djhaskin987 commented Oct 5, 2016 For instance, the CentOS 'testing' archive is one that does NOT seek to expressly provide an update path.
Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File Cpio Digest Mismatch
Got a patch for a bug? https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/issues/262 It may help find a solution :) djhaskin987 commented Oct 5, 2016 • edited Ah, I see the commented out block. [[email protected] centre]$ grep -r 'prelink' /usr/lib/rpm/ Binary file /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_recover matches Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File Md5 Sum Mismatch To do that, use the following command: [[email protected] ~]$ cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS [[email protected] SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba mypackage.spec The rpmbuild -ba command will run through all the steps of the RPM building process, Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File Cpio Read what version of RPM?
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list. http://smartphpstatistics.com/error-unpacking/error-unpacking-of-archive-failed-on-file-cpio-read-failed-bad-file-descriptor.html I didn't need to do this wicked hack to get things running there; things just worked. djhaskin987 commented Oct 5, 2016 @jordansissel post the commented out block? Sometimes the BuildRequires may need to be adjusted for changed package names or versions, or to add requirements that have been inadvertently omitted from the spec file. Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File Cpio Open
However, I see small hints that prelink is somehow invoked when rpms are installed (or upgraded?), but I'm not having much luck finding exactly what triggers that... Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. You should probably not try to use this procedure to upgrade glibc, gcc, python, perl, or other core system components to a later version. http://smartphpstatistics.com/error-unpacking/error-unpacking-of-archive-failed-on-file-cpio-read.html This is a more complex situation than just rebuilding the SRPM, though, and if you are going down this route you should probably read more on the subject, as explained below,
Does anyone know how I can resolve this issue? Error Unpacking Of Archive Failed On File /usr/lib64/firefox/dictionaries Cpio Rename djhaskin987 commented Oct 7, 2016 • edited The best solution, thinking about it more, is something fpm might be able to help with :) It seems to be the case that That really helps me on my end.
LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise RPM cpio: MD5 sum mismatch error User Name Remember Me?
You signed in with another tab or window. Breakpoint 2, fdFiniDigest (fd=0x20af6d0, hashalgo=PGPHASHALGO_MD5, datap=0x7ffc3f1e9c80, lenp=0x0, asAscii=0) at rpmio.c:2033 (gdb) step
We're not sure why its failing for you. For instance, it is often possible to rebuild SRPMs for CentOS 5 in a CentOS 4 machine. Inside the file build/files.c, the function which called rpmDoDigest then happily ignores this error code and went right on going, assuming the digest was computed correctly. this contact form Powered by Blogger.
Post Reply Print view Search Advanced search 12 posts • Page 1 of 1 dognose Posts: 232 Joined: 2005-03-08T22:16:37-07:00 MD5 sum mismatch Quote Postby dognose » 2009-06-22T19:29:54-07:00 Trying to update my Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started fpm -s dir -C fo -n fo -v 4 -t rpm Using this solution, the problem is avoided because RPM detects that the file isn't prelinked to begin with, so instead Very nice blog!
I've never run into this problem myself, but if it's still occurring, we can fix it. How to migrate OO1.1.3 Gsi to OO 2.0 Gsi , scripts... Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. That command pipes the newly-un-prelinked file (libpython3.5m.so.1.0) through a pipe back to RPM so that it can compute its md5 digest for use in the CPIO archive.
What is actually being checksum'd during an install? > > RPM does a checksum on file content while installing, that's the failure you are seeing. You'll see a directory in there called 'fpm_work', that's where I told fpm to put its temporary directory stuff so I can look at it later :) let me know if If we add this macro, the rpm is happy: %__prelink_undo_cmd /bin/cat cat library For example, if I put the above in ~/.rpmmacros, then run fpm: % fpm -fs dir -t rpm More details are below but the most >recent thing I've discovered is the call to NSS_NoDB_Init fails with -5925 >during RPMBUILD and RPM installs, so I'm wondering if this could be
cd ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/ diff -Npru existing_directory.orig existing_directory > name_of_your_patch_file.patch cp name_of_your_patch_file.patch ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/ cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ edit the mypackage.spec file to add the definition of name_of_your_patch_file.patch and the application of your_patch_file -- please look is rpmbuild running prelink on binaries at package-time or something? After some initial problems with x86_64 libraries on a i686 system, I managed to get the rpm to build. Already have an account?